Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-20-1
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-20-1
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
2 (
2
); 85-91

A Comparison of Effectiveness of Two Surgical Units in Performing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Qassim University and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

This study compared the effectiveness of two surgical units in a tertiary care teaching hospital in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures from a hospital administration perspective. One surgical unit that was first to undertake laparoscopic procedures in the hospital had more experience than the other. The effectiveness was measured in terms of Average Postoperative Hospital Stay that directly affects Bed Turnover Rate and Average Duration of Surgery that directly affects OT Utilization. Rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy was also calculated for each unit separately. The same was compared with the globally acceptable standard. The study design was retrospective, collecting data from the medical records department. The sample size was calculated at level of significance of 5% and power of 90%. There is significance difference in the two surgical units only in terms of the duration of surgery. Conversion rates to open cases are well within the global standard and there is no significant difference between the two units in terms of post operative stay. Continuous medical education in terms of national/international workshops and in-house training for surgeons of Unit B are enough to further sharpen their skills in laparoscopy.


Fulltext Views
335

PDF downloads
177
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections