Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
16 (
5
); 32-39

Association of follistatin and cytochrome p450 side-chain cleavage enzyme with polycystic ovarian syndrome

King Faisal Medical Complex Taif, Saudi Arabia
Department of Biochemistry, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan
Department of Biological Sciences, Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Address for correspondence: Dr. Fouzia Nazir, King Faisal Medical Complex, Taif, Saudi Arabia. E-mail: nazirs2000@hotmail.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Qassim Uninversity and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Objectives:

Polycystic ovarian syndrome is a complex disorder commonly found in women in their reproductive age around the globe. Due to its higher clinical implications and communicability, this research article describes epidemiological studies and the association of known microsatellite markers with PCOS in the Pakistani population.

Methods:

Data were collected from 62 Pakistani women. The study involved pedigree analysis which revealed recessive mode of inheritance in all of them. The mendelian ratio in marriages between non-PCOS (male) and PCOS (female) individuals remained 1:1 while between non-PCOS (male) and non-PCOS (female) remained 3:1, respectively.

Results:

The result showed that there was an association of marker D15S519 (CYP11A, 10q24.3) with family 5 with an X2 value of 7.78 (P < 0.01) while a strong association of marker D5S822 (FS, 5p14) with an X2 value of 4.89 (P < 0.05) was observed in family 2. In the case of family 1, a weak association of allele 1 with marker D19S212 (INSL3, 19p13.1) was observed with an X2 value of 2.25 (P > 0.10), While family 6 also presented a very weak association of homozygosity with marker D19S391 (INS receptor, 19p13.2) with X2 value of 3.45 (P ≥ 0.05).

Conclusion:

Findings indicated a higher prevalence of PCOS and highlights the emergence of more interventions to minimize the level of complications in women. Our intrusions intended to describe the genetic basis of PCOS in Pakistani population with special emphasis on large families in current study. Moreover, association of known loci for PCOS with our families.

Keywords

Cytochrome p450 side-chain
endocrine disorder
follistatin microsatellite markers
Pakistan
Polycystic ovarian syndrome

Introduction

Women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) produce an abnormal amount of male hormones known as androgens. Among disorders of the reproductive age group, PCOS requires particular attention[1] because 5–10% of the pre-menopausal women are affected by PCOS and its major manifestations are chronic anovulation and hyperandrogenism.[2]

Clinical characteristics and histological features should be analyzed for the symptoms of obesity, bleeding, infertility, as well as miscarriages.[3,4] Biochemically, PCOS can be described with hyperandrogenism and elevated serum luteinizing hormone (LH) as well as hyperinsulinemia. Hyperinsulinemia has been documented as the cause of hyperandrogenism in PCOS women.[5-7] Another study suggested that PCOS increases the risk of cardiovascular as well as diabetic events.[8] The main cause that results in PCOS is still known; however, insulin resistance, inflammation, and genes are associated with excess androgen production in women suffering from PCOS. PCOS can be explained by different pathways. Those pathways include metabolic as well as regulatory avenues and genes should also be assessed for the identification of candidate genes.[9] The familial clustering phenomenon of PCOS cases has been studied for the past 30 years and evidence has suggested that PCOS propagates in the family and the risk for the family members increases up to the extent of 50% but the mode of transmission has not been agreed yet.[10-12,14-16]

The possible candidate genes have been analyzed previously,[17] involved in the pathways of steroid hormones, metabolism and action, gonadotrophic action, obesity and energy regulation, and insulin action.[17-19] Primers were designed to amplify these possibly polymorphic sites, that is, short tandem repeat polymorphism (STRPs) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs), which were located within or adjacent to the candidate genes.[20]

Power estimates can describe the linkage between markers and disease-susceptibility locus as well as the in formativeness of markers. High-density genetic maps have been created which could facilitate positional cloning projects.[21,22] The CYP11A mRNA was observed to be more abundant in the theca cells of individuals with polycystic ovary syndrome as compared to the theca cells of normal individuals. The potential of developing an association is triggered by different factors, and the medical practitioners should evaluate the locus genotypes for the possible penetration of the disease[23] Candidate genes known for PCOS include genes involved in the biosynthesis of androgens, action of insulin, and gonadotrophin[24-28] Genes for different receptors have also been reported as PCOS candidate genes. The key genes associated with dysregulation of androgen production in women include CYP11a, CYP21, CYP17, and CYP19. To study the genetic basis of PCOS, linkage and association studies can be a valid tool.[29] The objective of the present study involves the determination of the Mendelian inheritance of trait, segregation of microsatellite markers for particular loci and determination of the genetic basis of PCOS using linkage analysis and association study strategies.

Materials and Methods

Diagnosis of PCOS

PCOS diagnosis was carried out using ultrasound and biochemical analysis of these families. Women with menstrual problems, hirsutism, obesity, and infertility were designated as polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) women. Phenotype of the six families described in the present study was hirsutism with ferriman gallwey scoring, obesity by body mass index and waist: hip ratio, diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome individual with Rotterdam criteria (2003).

Women diagnosed with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) at Prof. Dr. Saad Raana Gynecological Advisory Centre, Islamabad were interviewed to record information required for the present study. Extensive pedigrees were drawn[30] for the genetic studies. Probands were interviewed to trace back the disease in each family. In the context of genetic studies, probands are individuals that initiate the study and research process in a family. The pedigrees were constructed for at least up to five generations depending on how much the proband could recollect about the disease in the members of the family. There were 121 women from six families, of which 17 women died and 42 were not available for interview. A total of 62 women agreed to cooperate. Blood samples were collected from 62 women in sterile containers containing potassium ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) prepared for DNA extraction. Written consent was taken from all the subjects involved in the study.

DNA extraction from whole blood

DNA was extracted from whole blood using standard procedure.[19]

Polymerase chain Reaction (PCR)[20]

Microsatellite markers for the known loci of PCOS as described in Table 1 were obtained from research genetics, Inc. (USA). The cytogenetic information was obtained from genome databases including gdb.org and marshmed.org.

Table 1 37 candidate gene panel for PCOS

The polymerase chain reaction was performed using the following reaction mixture

  • Sample DNA 1 μl (microliter)

  • 10X PCR buffer 2.5 μl

  • MgCl2 (Magnesium Chloride) 1.5 μl

  • Deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate (dNTPs) 0.5 μl

  • Forward and reverse primer 0.3 μl

  • Taq DNA polymerase 0.3 μl

  • PCR water 20.1 μl

A thermo-cycling environment was used for obtaining the mixture as follows:

  • 5 min of 90°C for template denaturation

  • 40 cycles of amplification each consisting of 3 steps

  • 1 min at 90°C for DNA denaturation

  • 1 min at 55–57°C for primer annealing

  • 1 min at 72°C for extension of complimentary

  • DNA strand

  • 10 min at 72°C for un-extended strands left

  • PCR was performed subsequently.

Agarose gel electrophoresis

PCR products were resolved on 2% agarose gel.

Poly acrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE)[21]

The amplified products were resolved on 8% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Electrophoresis was carried out at 100 volts for 90 min and the gel was stained with ethidium bromide (10 mg/ml) solution for visualization on UV trans-illuminator. The gel was photographed by using a digital camera DC120 (Kodak, USA).

Genetic and primer database analysis

Analysis of microsatellite markers for the known loci as entitled in Table 1 was performed by PCR and gel electrophoresis. Amplified products using microsatellite markers were visualized by placing the ethidium bromide-stained gel on a UV trans-illuminator and genotypes were assigned by visual inspection. Homozygosity and heterozygosity were recorded and alleles were numbered concerning the origin.

Statistical analysis

Association between microsatellite markers for the known loci of PCOS and the disease was carried out using Chi-square analysis.

Results

Pedigree analysis

The six pedigrees proceeded for the present study indicated recessive mode of inheritance. Pedigrees of the strongly associated families, that is, family 2 and family 5 have been described in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. Phenotype of PCOS women in current study exhibit significant hirsutism, obesity acne, acanthosis nigricans and fertility and menstrual issues in 50% moderate hirsutism and acanthosis nigrican in 52.5% women. Family 2 showed strong association with D5S822 at locus (X2 = 4.89; P < 0.05) while family 5 depicted strong association with D15S519 (X2 = 7.78; P < 0.01). Family 1, 3, 4, and 6 showed weak association with different markers [Tables 2 and 3].

Family 2 Screening
Figure 1
Family 2 Screening
Screening of family 5
Figure 2
Screening of family 5
Table 2 Association of microsatellite markers with families of PCOS
Table 3 Statistical analysis of associated markers

Figures 3 and 4 show the Acrylamide gel photographs of markers for chromosomes in different families to investigate the affected, normal and positioning of each individual. It was observed that 7 individuals that were affected ranged from 4 to 9 and 7 normal individuals ranged from 2 to 6. Two types of marriages were observed in these pedigrees (i) a marriage between PCOS and normal and (ii) between normal and non-PCOS. In both marriages, the data was assembled regarding the inheritance of PCOS and non-PCOS conditions in the offspring. Data revealed a 1:1 Mendelian ratio between normal and non-PCOS marriages [Table 4] while a Mendelian ratio of 3:1 has been observed in marriages between normal and PCOS individuals [Table 5].

Acrylamide gel Photographs of markers for chromosome no.5 with family 2
Figure 3
Acrylamide gel Photographs of markers for chromosome no.5 with family 2
Acrylamide gel photographs of markers for chromosome no. 15 family[15]
Figure 4
Acrylamide gel photographs of markers for chromosome no. 15 family[15]
Table 4 The goodness of fit into 1:1 Mendelian ratio in marriages between non-PCOS and PCOS individuals
Table 5 The goodness of fit into 3:1 Mendelian ratio in marriages between non-PCOS and PCOS individuals

Association study results

Strong and weak association of different families has been described in Tables 2 and 3.

Family 1

There is no significant association of allele 1 with marker D19S212 but there is the presence of a weak association (X2(1) = 2.25, P > 0.10) in the transmission of allele 1 with marker D19S212 (19p13.1 INSL3, Leydig insulin-like protein 3).

Family 2

In family 2, PCOS individuals showed homozygosity with allele 1 with marker D5S822, and a strong association was observed at this gene locus (X2(1) = 4.89, P < 0.05, Follistatin 5p14).

Family 3

No significant association has been observed among PCOS and non-PCOS individuals of family 3 and allele 1.

Family 4

In family 4, a weak association of allele 1 with D2S293 (2q13) was observed (X2(1) =2.85, P > 0.05, Inhibin βB).

Family 5

In PCOS women, a strong association of homozygosity for allele 1 with marker D15S519 (CYP11A cytochrome P450, 10q24.3) has been observed (X2(1) = 7.78 P < 0.01).

Family 6

Genes segregating with different markers showed homozygosity and heterozygosity evenly distributed. A weak association of homozygosity for allele 1 with marker D19S391 (INS receptor 19p 13.2) was observed (X2(1) = 3.45, P > 0.05).

Discussion

A polycystic ovarian syndrome is considered a complex disorder in a clinical setting. The Present study showed autosomal mode of inheritance in all families. Current study describes that there is a strong association of PCOS locus at chromosome 5 with marker D5S822 (P < 0.05) in family 2 for allele 1 [Tables 1-5]. A study[18,22,23] involved families from European descent (n = 90), Caribbean descent (n = 5), Mexican descent (n = 2), African-American descent (n = 1), and Asian-Indian descent (n=1). The association between PCOS and alleles for four markers (D5S474, D5S822, D5S623, and the SNP in exon 6) was carried out. TDT analysis revealed that 2 markers with the highest X2 values were the exon 6 variant (allele 1, X2= 5, P = 0.025) and the D5S623 (allele 11, X2 = 4.26, P = 0.039). The expression level of follistatin between PCOS and control subjects was compared but no substantial difference was found. The present study highlighted that PCOS are a complex genetic trait requiring immediate medical attention in Pakistan. Current research indicated a very strong association of PCOS locus with marker D15S519 at chromosome 15 for allele1 (P < 0.01) in the case of family 5 [Table 2]. This marker is derived from the genetic region of CYP11A which has been involved previously in the etiology of PCOS.[18] Their association data indicated that allele variants of CYP11A mediate the development of hyperandrogenemia, which, in turn, is associated with PCOS and hirsutism.[24] Results of family 6 indicated that there is a weak association of PCOS locus at chromosome 19 with marker D19S391 (P =0.05) for allele 1, While a very weak association of PCOS locus at marker D195212 for allele 1 in the case of family 1 has been observed (P > 0.01) [Table 3]. Marker D19S391 has been derived from insulin receptor gene locus while marker D19S212 has been derived from the INSL3 region which represents Leydig insulin-like protein 3. Similar research[31,32] revealed that insulin receptor gene marker D19S884 was significantly associated with PCOS [P = 0.001]. They suggested that the susceptibility gene for PCOS was located on chromosome 19p13.3 in the insulin receptor region and insulin-stimulated androgen secretion from the ovarian stroma. INSR function in the ovary is likely involved in the gender susceptibility of PCOS. Another demonstration revealed[33] that a D19S884 allele shows significant evidence for linkage and association specific to a phenotype of PCOS. A study indicated the involvement of the insulin receptor gene by taking into consideration the tyrosine kinase domain of the insulin receptor gene. They studied 22 patients with PCOS but no abnormalities have been indicated. Molecular scanning of the entire coding region of the gene in 24 hyperinsulinemia subjects was carried out with PCOS but no significant mutation has been detected.[34] They concluded that mutation of the insulin receptor gene is, therefore, unlikely to be a major cause of insulin resistance in PCOS. A similar opinion was given by another study[35] in their study. Present study showed secondary amenorrhea in significant number of women which is indicative of anovulation which depicts problem in their steroid and insulin metabolism. Family 2 2 revealed strong association with D5S822 which is follistatin gene marker. Follistatin is involved in autocrine, paracrine and endocrine control of ovarian folliculogenesis.[29]

Family 5 showed strong association with D15S519 which is involved in steroid hormone control. Candidate genetic loci including CYP11A, CYP17, follistatin, and insulin receptor have been identified by mutation detection, linkage, and case–control association studies. However, traditional linkage analyses have been confounded by extreme phenotypic heterogeneity.[30] In the search of candidate regions for PCOS, many studies were carried out. Follistatin gene was sequenced but subsequent linkage and association studies yielded negative results.[22] A vigorous debate is under consideration about whether PCOS is fundamentally a neuroendocrine or ovarian disorder. Evidence is accumulating in favor of the latter. Thus, it seems that PCOS creates genetic complications and causes abnormalities such as steroidogenesis[25]

It is concluded that different results report the relationship of genes to the risk of PCOS.[1] The mutations concerning PCOS have not been analyzed extensively particularly its effect on the phenotype. Thus, the future researchers must focus on addressing the mutations of PCOS and its impact on phenotype. The complications in the treatment follow an irregular pattern and they require a patient-centered approach and examination.

Reducing complications of the disease

Polycystic ovarian syndrome which is also known as metabolic syndrome is associated with short-term and long-term complications ranging between obesity hirsutism, menstrual problem, fertility issues and endometrial carcinoma and diabetes mellitus. The reproductive system can be improved by weight loss and a dietary pattern in order to influence insulin resistance. A lifestyle that reduces obesity and IR is the major step to follow by patients with PCOS because even 5% of weight loss can make a significant change. It would also be beneficial to keep track of the situation and provide the patients the safety and therapeutic dietary plans for the recovery procedure. The biosynthesis of CYP11A breaks down the chain of polymerase using the PCR technique which enables the synthesis of accumulated cholesterol and limits a steroid synthetic hormone pathway.[23,35]

Conclusion

The current study aimed to determine the association of follistatin and cytochrome p450 side-chain cleavage enzyme (CYP11A) in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). The study targeted the Pakistani population. A sample of 62 participants based on 6 families was collected to obtain data and analyze it in context with CYP11A and PCOS. Furthermore, the findings showed a strong association of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) locus at chromosome 5 with marker D5S822 in family 2. The POCS possesses the ability to generate complications in genetics resulting in abnormalities such as steroidogenesis. The study concluded that treatment and diagnosis complications are a major concern in Pakistan and require a more patient-centered approach to treat the disorder and eliminate the complications. Hence, future medical researchers should pay more attention to addressing the mutations of PCOS and its effect on the phenotype. The study also signifies the sensitivity of the relationship between PCOS and the insulin gene marker (D19S884) that is vitally involved in the gender susceptibility in the ovaries. Multiple genes have been examined for the study of PCOS but none of them seem to play a part in PCOS. However, the candidate genes INS VNTR and CYP11A were observed as the encoders of P450 chain cleavage.

Limitations and future direction

Certain limitations hurdle up while investigating genotypes and phenotypes of the PCOS cases, like, the ongoing need for research on diagnostic methods to the complexities associated with PCOS. Another complication is allocating the visible status of women diagnosed with PCOS and showed inflated responses. There are many clinical and biochemical manifestations advised for the phenotype, primarily irregular menstrual flow, baldness and weight gain, insulin resistance and increased androgens. The minor statistics results were observed in the study due to the smaller size of the sample design of the targeted women population. However, more related studies are required to examine the genotype and phenotype associations of PCOS with specific gene linkages and gene sequencing and development of gene therapy for this syndrome. The knowledge related to humans and genes is escalating more frequently. With the aid of advanced biotechnological techniques and the discovery of novel polymorphisms, there is a possibility of complete mapping of the PCOS locus in the near future. These types of studies will also provide a new way to investigate early PCOS diagnosis in women, screening families with the possibility of PCOS, and measuring complications associated with PCOS in women.

Acknowledgments

The author is thankful to HEC (Higher Education Commission) Pakistan for funding the current project. It is worthy to acknowledge the full support and supervision of Dr. Samina Jalali (Ex-Chairperson, Department of Biological Sciences, QAU, Islamabad) and Dr. Raheel Qamar (Director PCR Lab, Shifa College of Medicine, current Rector, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology) throughout the project.

Authors’ Declaration Statements

Ethical approval

The study was carried out after taking ethical approval from the IRB (institutional review board) of Shifa international hospital Islamabad, Pakistan on 29.04.2004 with reference number IRB# 005-03-04. The study was carried on the 62 individuals and the duration of study was 2 years.

Ethical Consent

No author conducted research using animals. All operations involving human subjects were authorized by the institutional committee ethical standards and in line with the Helsinki Declaration (1964) and its subsequent revisions.

Patient’s Consent Statement

Consent was taken before going to conduct this study.

Availability of Data and Material

Data will provide on request.

Competing Interests

There author declares no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

None

Authors’ Contributions

All authors have contributed equally in design, data collection, manuscript preparation, and revision. All authors agreed on the results and therefore approved the final version of the manuscript.

References

  1. , , . Molecular progress in infertility:Polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:569-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Insulin-sensitising agents in polycystic-ovary syndrome. Lancet. 1998;351:305-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Clinical manifestation of polycystic ovarian disease. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1988;17:560-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . The female genital system and breast. Robbins Basic Pathol. 2003;7:679-717.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Polycystic ovarian disease:Contribution of vaginal endosonography and reassessment of ultrasonic diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:1062-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . The role of hyperinsulinemia in the pathogenesis of ovarian hyperandrogenism. Fertil Steril. 1988;50:197-212.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . The pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome:Lessons from ovarian stimulation studies. J Endocrinol Invest. 1998;21:567-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. . Hum Reprod. 2004;19:41-7.
  9. , , , , , , . Thirty-seven candidate genes for polycystic ovary syndrome:Strongest evidence for linkage is with follistatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1999;96:8573-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . Hereditary factors in the Stein-Leventhal syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1968;100:371-87.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . The inheritance of polycystic ovarian disease and a possible relationship to premature balding. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1979;11:291-300.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , . Familial polycystic ovarian disease. Endocrinology Metab Clin North Am. 1988;17:771-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Familial polycystic ovaries:A genetic disease? Clin Endocrinol. 1988;6:593-605.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Familial clustering in the polycystic ovarian syndrome. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1989;28:23-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Evidence for a single gene effect causing polycystic ovaries and male pattern baldness. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1993;38:653-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Association of the steroid synthesis gene CYP11a with polycystic ovary syndrome and hyperandrogenism. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6:397-402.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . Insulin action in the normal and polycystic ovary. Endocrinol Metabol Clin North Am. 1999;28:361-78.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , . Polymerase chain reaction:Basic protocol plus trouble shooting and optimazition strategies. J Vis Exp. 2012;63:3988.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , . , ed. Fundamental Labortory Approaches for Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Hoboken: Wiley and Sons; .
  20. , , , . Genetics:The tyrosine kinase domain of the insulin receptor gene is normal in women with hyperinsulinaemia and polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1681-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . Molecular scanning of the insulin receptor gene in women with the polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 1996;81:1979-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , . Linkage and association of insulin gene VNTR regulatory polymorphism with polycystic ovary syndrome. Lancet. 1997;349:986-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . Insulin resistance-mechanisms, syndromes, and implications. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:938-48.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , . Insulin action in the polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocrinol Metabol Clin North Am. 1999;28:341-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , . Genetic basis of metabolic abnormalities in polycystic ovary syndrome. Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2004;2:93-107.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , . Recommendations for standardized human pedigree nomenclature. J Genet Couns. 1995;4:267-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , . Molecular Cloning:A Laboratory Manual (2nd ed). New York: Cold Spring Harbor Press; .
  28. , , , , , . Microsatellite polymorphism (tttta) n at-528 base pairs of gene CYP11a influences hyperandrogenemia in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:735-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , . Evidence for association of polycystic ovary syndrome in caucasian women with a marker at the insulin receptor gene locus. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2001;86:446-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , . Current concepts in the polycystic ovary syndrome. Annu Rev Med. 2001;52:401-19.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , . The genetic basis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;147:717-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , . Genetic analysis of candidate genes for the polycystic ovary syndrome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2002;9:492-501.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , . A paradigm for finding genes for a complex human trait:Polycystic ovarian syndrome and follistatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:8315-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , . Preliminary investigation of follistatin gene mutations in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;6:587-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , . Augmented androgen production is a stable steroidogenic phenotype of propagated theca cells from polycystic ovaries. Mol Endocrinol. 1999;13:946-57.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections