Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
8 (
4
); 335-345

Atlas and axis injuries role of Halovest

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Qassim University and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background: The literature regarding the different patterns of atlas and axis injuries and their appropriate management and the progressive development in the management of these injuries is scarce from our world, so we presenting here our experience of management of these injuries by applying Halovest. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients (22 males, 8 females) with atlas and axis injuries were treated and then followed-up for an average of 24 months. The data was analysed with respect to type of injury and use of Halovest in the treatment of these injuries. The patients with neuro defecit were scored as per ASIA grading scale (from Grade A to Grade E). Results: The halo-vest immobilization was used for a mean period of 12 ± 3weeks (range 9 to 15 weeks) for atlas and axis injuries. Four patients had neurodeficit. Two patients recovered from ASIA Grade C to ASIA Grade D. One patient improved from ASIA grade D to ASIA grade E while as one patient with neurodeficit was lost to follow up. No death or worsening of the neurodeficit was observed during the follow up period. Conclusion: The clinical as well as radiological outcome of these injuries is mostly satisfactory with the conservative management using Halovest. More studies should be conducted to form the guidelines regarding patient selection for conservative management using halovest.

Keywords

atlas fracture
axis fracture
upper cervical spine injuries
halovest

Fulltext Views
151

PDF downloads
67
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections