Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-20-1
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-20-1
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
6 (
2
); 127-134

Comparison of different screening tests for diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in Primary Health Care setting

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Qassim University and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background: DPN is an important complication and contributes to the morbidity of diabetes mellitus. Evidence indicates early detection of DPN results in fewer foot ulcers and amputations. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare different screening tests in the detection of DPN in primary care setting. Methodology: It is a cross-sectional study in a random sample (N = 242) of type 2 diabetes mellitus participants at primary care setting. Different screening tests for detecting DPN such as Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI), Semmes-WeinsteinMonofilament (SWM), vibration sensation and ankle reflex were performed for each patient and compare between them. Results: 45% of the participant had DPN based on MNSI, The detection rate using the 128-Hz tuning fork and 10-g SWM was nearly same (32.6 & 31.4%) respectively and significantly higher than ankle reflexes (23.1%). Although, the prevalence of DPN determined by the combined two tests (38.79%) was higher than that through the single test. Conclusion: this study showed different results of DPN screening tests, even in the same group of patients. However there was a significant correlation between them. 128-Hz tuning fork and 10-g SWM monofilament would appear to be an appropriate, cheap and easy to use tool for identifying patients at risk of having neuropathy in primary care setting.


Fulltext Views
395

PDF downloads
340
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections