Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
9 (
1
); 41-49

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice of Restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth by Dentists in North of Saudi Arabia

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Qassim University and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the knowledge, current approaches, techniques and practices for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) among general dental practitioners and specialists in north of Saudi Arabia. Methodology: A standard questionnaire based survey containing 16 multiple choice questions about techniques and treatment methods, frequency of post, type of post, choice of luting cement, core material, reason of failure of endodontic treatment was distributed by hand and through email among 255 general dentists and specialists. The data were processed by using SPSS statistical software. Results: The majority of clinicians (54%) believed that post reinforces the remaining tooth structure and reduces fracture probability. The ferrule effect was considered an important factor in increasing fracture resistance of the ETT (72%). The preferred technique for restoring ETT was core material along with 1-2 mm of ferule (41%) followed by prefabricated post and core build up (25%). On the basis of post material, the most common was metal (43%) followed by fiber post (41%). 2/3rd length of the root canal for the post length (67%) , 4-5mm apical seal of gutta percha after post placement (47%) and for the post diameter, 1/3rd of root diameter (51%) was agreed by most of the participants. Composite resin (61%) was the most popular material for core foundation followed by amalgam (23%). Conclusion: The surveyed practitioners had a sound knowledge of the techniques and materials for restoring ETT with the exception that post reinforces the remaining tooth structure and reduces fracture probability.

Keywords

Dentists
Endodontically treated teeth
Knowledge
Restoration

Fulltext Views
153

PDF downloads
64
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections