Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-20-1
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-20-1
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
12 (
2
); 41-47

Utilization of clinical pathway on open appendectomy: A quality improvement initiative in a private hospital in the Philippines

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Qassim University and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Objective: This study was done to evaluate the utilization of Clinical Pathway (CP) on open appendectomy as a quality improvement (QI) initiative. Methods: The CP document was developed from the clinical practice guideline created by the Philippine College of Surgeons using an event-timeline tabular checklist format. After a hospital-wide education, the CP was implemented on January 1, 2010 as the QI intervention. Appendectomies done four years prior to the intervention were assigned to the pre-pathway group while those done five years after were assigned to the post-pathway group. Demographic data were collected including the different clinical outcomes such as the average length of stay, co-morbidity, diagnostic modality used, hospital cost, and variance rate. Data were presented as mean ± SD and percentage which ever were applicable. Statistical analysis was done using Student t-Test for numerical data and chi-square for dichotomous data. Significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Two hundred ninety five patients were included in the study. Separate analysis was done for uncomplicated (Pre-pathway Group, n=49 and Post-pathway group, n=139) and complicated (Pre-pathway Group, n=38 and Post-pathway Group, n=69) open appendectomies. Results showed that diagnosis was achieved through history and physical examination. Ultrasound use did not significantly differ between groups and types of open appendectomy. Major findings showed significant decrease in ALOS, hospitalization cost, and variance in the post-pathway group compared with the pre-pathway group (p<0.05). Conclusion: These findings supported the use of CP in QI of healthcare in commonly done surgeries like appendectomy.


Fulltext Views
246

PDF downloads
576
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections