Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
1 (
2
); 185-193

Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Priming before Gynaecological Procedures on Non Pregnant Women

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Qassim University and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background Misoprostol has been extensively researched for its use in obstetrics and has proved to be a very effective cervical softening agent before termination of pregnancy. The beneficial effects on cervical ripening may make misoprostol a desirable agent for helping cervical dilatation on non pregnant women also. The objective is to study the efficacy of preoperative vaginal application of misoprostol as cervical priming agent before gynaecological procedures on non pregnant women. Methods Design: A randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of two medical colleges. Participants: 468 non pregnant pre-menopausal nulli-parous or parous women scheduled to have diagnostic D&C or diagnostic hysteroscopy operations. Interventions: 400 mcg intravaginal misoprostol (229 women) in the study group and 400 mg intravaginal metronidazole as placebo (231women) in control group. Outcome Measure: The main outcome measures were baseline cervical width at the beginning of the procedures, the number of women who required further cervical dilatation, time taken for dilatation, side effects and other complications. Results : Base line cervical width in the study group was significantly higher than control group (4.6±0.8 mm vs. 3.8±0.7 mm, p < 0.0001). 141 (61.57%) cases required further cervical dilatation in the study group compared to 206 (89.18%) in the control group (p < 0.0001). Time taken for further cervical dilatation was significantly lower in the study group compared to control group (48.3±18.4 sec vs. 68.6±17.3 sec, p < 0.0001). Cervical injury and uterine perforation occurred in 12 and 3 women respectively in the control group compared to 1 and 0 women respectively in the misoprostol group. Two most common side effects of vaginal misoprostol were mild lower abdominal pain (21%) and slight vaginal bleeding (09.2%) which were within tolerable limit. Conclusion: Preoperative vaginal application of misoprostol before gynaecological procedures on non pregnant women decreases the cervical resistance, facilitates the cervical dilatation and operative procedures minimizing cervical or uterine injuries.


Fulltext Views
306

PDF downloads
96
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections