Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-20-1
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-20-1
Editorial I
Editorial II
Original Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
5 (
1
); 11-18

Young Public’s Awareness to Refractive Error Deficiency

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Qassim University and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background: Visual impairment due to uncorrected refractive error affects 200 - 250 million people in the world. Uncorrected vision represents the 2nd or the 3rd blinding condition in many developing countries. The importance of awareness in dealing with this problem has been shown to reduce the risks of blindness and improve the quality of vision. Methods: Survey questionnaires have been distributed to 2500 randomly selected people from 6 different locations in Riyadh area between late 2003 and early 2004. Only 2039 data sheets (58% female and 42% male) have been analyzed; the remaining 461 data sheets were cancelled whether for biased responses or for ages those were outside the limited range (15-45 years). The questionnaire was designed to show responses according to three levels of education: basic, intermediate and high. Results: 8% of the sample individuals wear spectacle. Of these, 2/3 acknowledges the importance of wearing spectacles. For those who don’t, intellect is a determining factor in how people consider optical correction (21% of basic intellectual backgrounds only think it is important to wear glasses against some 40% of higher intellect). Most of the other results showed the effect of education in increasing the level of awareness in vision related questions. People with higher education are more aware than those with basic intellect in acknowledging: visual symptoms that need care (37% against only 26%), presbyopia condition (23% against 11%), urgency to seek eye care (85% against 29%), factors aggravating refractive errors in children (45% against 29%). Knowledge about the different forms of optical correction showed higher preference for spectacles against both contact lenses and refractive surgery. Conclusion: There is an overall tendency to show that the general public is not aware about most of the problems that concern their visual health. This is even more so in those with basic intellectual levels. In order to reduce the impact of visual problems related to ignorance in society, certain steps directed towards the general public should be undertaken, such as information through media and publicity, public education, screenings for ametropia in schools and at work, government subsidies of optical equipments etc.

Keywords

Refractive error
awareness
public
education
visual impairment

Fulltext Views
362

PDF downloads
149
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections